麻豆社事件

There are a thousand ways to kneel and kiss the ground; there are a thousand ways to go home again. 鈥擱umi

The way to stop climate change might be buried in 300 square feet of earth in the Venice neighborhood of Los 颅Angeles, amid kale and potatoes. A half-dozen city youth are digging through the raised bed on a quiet side street, planting tomato seedlings between peach and lime trees. Nineteen-year-old 颅Calvin sweats as he works the rake. There鈥檚 a lot at stake here. The formerly homeless youngsters are tentatively exploring farming through a community outreach program started by a California nonprofit called Kiss the Ground. 麻豆社事件 importantly, they are tending to the future of our planet.

鈥淪oil just might save us,鈥� filmmaker Josh Tickell says, 鈥渂ut we are going to have to save it first.鈥� He wrote that in his 2017 book, also called Kiss the Ground, after becoming deeply invested in the potential of soil to reverse climate change. (The nonprofit supports the book and 聽about it, though he has no role with the organization.) He has experienced both soil and climate change intimately. He started to work on farms more than two decades ago for World Wide Opportunities on Organic Farms, and in 2017 he and his family had to leave their home in .

Even as most of the world works to reduce emissions, new studies confirm that it will be impossible to stop climate change without changing agriculture. Soil degradation is slowly turning a third of the world into desert. At this rate, .

What exactly does soil have to do with climate change? In the atmosphere, too much carbon overheats the climate. But in the ground, carbon is useful.

Loss of topsoil releases carbon into the air. Modern petroleum-fueled agriculture, beginning around 1930, has 聽into the atmosphere. In a report last year, the U.N. warned that the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere increased at record speed to hit a level not seen for .

鈥淭he irony is that bringing carbon into the soil solves multiple global problems,鈥� Tickell says in Kiss the Ground. 鈥淚t reduces carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, it increases the fertility of the soil, it helps farmers grow more, and it allows the oceans to release the CO2 that threatens to acidify the phytoplankton that produce so much of the oxygen we breathe.鈥�

And there鈥檚 a simple way to get it into the ground. Instead of complicated bioengineering projects that attempt to trap carbon underground, initiatives such as Kiss the Ground鈥檚 propose that the best machines for binding the carbon in the ground already exist: plants.

鈥淭hey break the CO2 from the atmosphere down into its components and sequester the carbon in the soil,鈥� explains Don Smith, the organization鈥檚 research director. Modern agriculture that is focused on industrial efficiencies and profits disturbs this natural process, mainly through tilling, monocultures, and overuse of synthetic chemicals. 鈥淏ut methods such as composting, perennial plants, and biodiversity help regenerate the soil.鈥�

The idea behind regenerative farming is simple and ancient: The mother soil, which nurtures the harvest, in turn has to be nurtured and protected.

鈥淭he [plants] use sunlight as energy, pull the carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere, turn it into carbon fuel, and that鈥檚 how they grow,鈥� explains The Soil Will Save Us author Kristin Ohlson in Tickell鈥檚 documentary. 鈥淭hey send 40 percent of that carbon fuel down to their roots, and that鈥檚 one of the ways carbon gets fixed in soil.鈥�

Researchers for the French government estimate that the Earth can sequester 6 gigatons of CO2 in the soil yearly through planting the right kind of crops, thus compensating for the 4.3 gigatons of CO2 humanity emits into the atmosphere every year.

How realistic is this? Whendee Silver, lead researcher for the Marin Carbon Project and an ecosystem ecologist at the University of California, Berkeley, has calculated that if as little as 5 percent of California鈥檚 rangelands were coated with a thin layer of compost, the resulting carbon sequestration would .

In the Santa Ynez Valley, the Ted Chamberlin Ranch became the first ranch in Southern California to implement a large-scale carbon farming plan. A quarter-inch layer of compost applied two years ago increased the grazing land鈥檚 capacity to hold water, and grass production increased 24 percent. These kinds of results give ranchers and farmers economic incentive to help sequester carbon.

In fact, ranchers all over the country who shift to carbon farming find impressive results. Decades ago, in Bismarck, North Dakota, Gabe Brown had almost lost his ranch after several years of drought. He was able to turn it profitable again by working with natural systems, such as abandoning tilling, which disrupts soil. 鈥淲e have now eliminated the use of synthetic fertilizers, fungicides, and pesticides. We use minimal herbicide and are striving to eliminate it,鈥� the Brown鈥檚 ranch website states. 鈥淲e do not use GMOs or glyphosate. Our ever-evolving grazing strategy allows most of our pastures a recovery period of over 360 days.鈥� Brown is considered one of the pioneers of regenerative farming, and his farm is a flourishing model. 鈥淭hese strategies have allowed the health of the soil, the mineral and water cycles to greatly improve. In other words, the natural resources have benefited. This results in increased production, profit, and a higher quality of life for us. We are moving toward sustainability for not only ours, but future generations as well,鈥� the website states.

And the sequestration solution is not just for agriculture. A new study in the journal Science Advances found that better management of forests, grasslands, and soils in the United States could remedy as much as 21 percent of the country鈥檚 annual greenhouse gas emissions.

鈥淒one correctly,鈥� Tickell says in his book, 鈥渢he numbers suggest we could sequester most if not all of the CO2 that has been emitted by humanity thus far. 鈥� It would not absolve us of having to end the use of coal and petroleum-based fuels 鈥� but by using the restorative power of nature, it might give us a chance at a future that keeps a majority of Earth鈥檚 ecosystems intact.鈥�

Some experts believe the effect may be more marginal, pointing out that global warming is leading to more wildfires, and more wildfires lead to more carbon in the atmosphere. And the pressure of feeding growing populations can lead to more deforestation, more chemicals, more acres of natural land being converted for industrial farming. Outcomes will depend not only on how many farmers and states get on board, but on consumption patterns: how people eat, drink, and shop.

For this reason, Kiss the Ground regularly holds 鈥渟oil advocate鈥� trainings both at its Venice offices and online, gatherings of people who want to learn more about the connection between soil and climate. Given the potential for carbon sequestration in agriculture, there is a lot of discussion about food choices.

One of the group鈥檚 practical guides starts with 鈥淜now your food source.鈥� Some of the information is common sense: Eat what鈥檚 in season, whole foods instead of processed foods, grow your own, and compost. And some advice is controversial: 鈥淚f 50 percent of the world鈥檚 population ate 2,500 calories per day and reduced meat consumption overall, then an estimated 26.7 gigatons of emissions could be avoided from dietary change alone.鈥�

鈥淔ewer still know that conventionally farmed food requires 3 pounds of toxic chemicals per American per year.鈥�

People taking the training are often surprised to find out that sustainable ecological farming鈥攁nd healthy soil鈥攁ctually . Matthew and Terces Engelhart, founders of the popular vegan chain Caf茅 Gratitude and parents of Kiss the Ground co-founder Ryland 颅Engelhart, keep chickens and cattle on their farm in Northern California,聽. After 40 years as vegetarians, they decided to eat the meat from their own farm. The 颅Engelharts鈥� switch caused an outcry among the vegan community; they even received death threats.

Tickell and other Kiss the Ground advocates say the issue is less a question of whether to eat meat, but what kind. 鈥淔ewer still know that conventionally farmed food requires 3 pounds of toxic chemicals per American per year. And even fewer know that the process of growing organic produce requires the deaths of vast numbers of animals. Our choice for the future of food therefore is not vegan versus paleo versus omnivore versus vegetarian,鈥� Tickell writes in his book. 鈥淩ather, we must choose between a food system that honors and respects the lives of flora, fauna, planet, and people versus a system that demoralizes, dehumanizes, and destroys our biological commons.鈥�

For Tickell and so many others, it鈥檚 a down-to-earth solution.