A Way to Talk About Race, 6 Words at a Time
If you were asked to sum up your thoughts about race in six words, could you do it?
Eight years ago, Michele Norris, former host of NPR鈥檚 All Things Considered, asked people attending the book tour for her 2010 memoir, The Grace of Silence, to do just that.
The exercise was meant as a conversation starter, a way to engage people on the uncomfortable subject by having them write their thoughts on postcards and then share them with others鈥攄irectly and online. But Norris鈥 Race Card Project has become much more.
Businesses, churches, and other institutions have used it to facilitate uneasy discussions around race.
鈥淲hen I first started asking people to share their little six-word stories on postcards that I had printed, I didn鈥檛 know what it would become,鈥 Norris said. 鈥淚鈥檝e been surprised at how many people have turned to The Race Card Project as a trusted space to learn about someone else, to share their own story, [and] to use in a classroom or so that people can learn about each other or navigate this sort of difficult terrain around race and identity.鈥
The idea is even more relevant today. Nearly two-thirds of Americans say racism remains a problem in the United States, according to a . In fact, almost half of those polled say they believe race relations are getting worse.
But there鈥檚 hope. Whether due to the number of police killings of unarmed Black people, emboldening of White nationalist groups, or the introduction of terms like White fragility and microaggressions, the back-to-back presidencies of Barack Obama and Donald Trump have given rise to more public discourse around race.
The Race Card Project is one of seeking to address racism鈥攚hether it鈥檚 interpersonal, institutional, or systemic. In its first eight years, it archived more than 250,000 from all 50 states and more than 90 countries. The stories have come from people of various racial and cultural backgrounds, and across professions.
鈥淚 feel invisible, while standing out,鈥 read one essay by Aman Agah of Brooklyn, NY.
鈥淩ace doesn鈥檛 define how you act,鈥 wrote Ethan Flechner of Milwaukee, WI.
Norris, a veteran journalist, has also been invited to facilitate countless discussions鈥攕ometimes within theatrical productions or dramatic readings; sometimes at roundtables or group chats. Always, they are a challenge.
鈥Conversations around race are difficult on a good day,鈥 Norris said. 鈥淏ut at a moment where we see these kinds of political divisions that have strong racial overtones and strong ethnic overtones, it makes that terrain even more perilous.鈥
鈥淐onversations around race are difficult on a good day.鈥
At the University of Michigan, which became the focal point for a series of U.S. Supreme Court cases on affirmative action and where a Black student group launched a that brought international attention to the treatment of Black students on campus, the project set the stage for wide-ranging dialogue around race.
Professor and legal historian Martha Jones, who was co-director of the law school鈥檚 program in race, law, and history and former associate chair of the Afroamerican and African studies department, had spearheaded a group that brought TRCP to campus in the spring of 2013. Organizers themed the event Understanding Race.
鈥淸It] was in a sense a continuation of the work we鈥檝e always done,鈥 said Jones, who is now at Johns Hopkins University. 鈥淏ut it was also a recognition that we were moving beyond the posture of litigation to think in more interdisciplinary ways and more campus specific ways about race.鈥
Jones said the purpose was to help people distill their ideas and reflections about race. 鈥淭here are a lot of people who are not going to come to a lecture. They鈥檙e not going to come to an academic conference. They鈥檙e not going to take a special course,鈥 she explained. 鈥淏ut the postcards, we thought, had the ability to touch many more people who might not participate in any of the other events.鈥
Norris and TRCP worked with the university to design a special postcard for the campus. She attended a series of events, including a public lecture and a pop-up installation on the Diag, the central crossroads in the middle of campus. And she directed a performance of dramatic readings of the race cards. She also met in small groups with the university鈥檚 president and executive leadership with students, and with faculty and staff.
They talked about race in their lives, race on the campus, racism as one of the challenges to a campus community.
鈥淓verybody has a past to be reckoned with.鈥
鈥淧art of her lesson to us was that while we could do large events and we could reach lots of people, some of the work of TRCP was always going to be happening in small settings, where colleagues and members of the campus community can really speak to one another,鈥 Jones said.
The Understanding Race theme was so impactful, that members of the campus community continue to post their six-word stories on RCP鈥檚 website.
In Marietta, Georgia, TRCP did similar work bringing two congregations together.
St. James Episcopal and Zion Baptist churches are each more than a century old and separated by a funeral home. But in 2011, their mostly White and Black parishioners crossed the invisible but very present racial barrier between them.
鈥淥ne day I was walking to the church and passed a Baptist church, where a sign read 鈥楩ormed by freed slaves in 1865,鈥 said Charles Dean Taylor, who was interim rector at the time. 鈥淎nd it occurred to me, I wondered if some of the slaves had been owned by members of St. James.鈥
While the congregations had shared each other鈥檚 facilities in the years before Taylor arrived, he was responsible for bringing the two churches together to specifically talk about race and the history of slavery that impacted them all.
鈥淚 had to leave that next year, or I would have tried to make it an annual thing,鈥 Taylor said. But, he explained, the work that was done in that one day over dinner between more than 100 people was a seed planted. 鈥淎nytime you gather around food, that鈥檚 another great way for people to increase fellowship,鈥 he said.
What Norris gave the congregants was a vehicle, Taylor continued. 鈥淭here鈥檚 a little bit of an awkwardness to it. Some embarrassment on our church鈥檚 part. The great thing is she provides a way to get over that to get through that. Everybody has an opportunity to say things about the racial divide. It starts easy.鈥
But the process was anything but. 鈥淚 will say, the problems that I had with getting my people there is that they had kind of perceived it to be what they would call political,鈥 said Taylor. 鈥淚n other words, this is a liberal kind of thing. And so, I had to really do some persuading 鈥 some the leaders of the parish worried if they were going to be persecuted, because I think some of the other programs had tended to kind of stick people. And then they鈥檇 say, I don鈥檛 want to do that anymore.鈥
That鈥檚 not what happened this time. Some who originally pushed back said in the end they were honored by the process.
鈥淓verybody has a past to be reckoned with,鈥 Taylor said. 鈥淵ou鈥檙e either going to let that past define you, control you, or put you in a mold or box, or listen to what I think is Scripture or the Holy Spirit.鈥
The question is, he said, 鈥渃an we be freed from that past, and therefore lead a better way? It was a graceful way to enter into those conversations.鈥
In addition to helping start difficult conversations, the postcards and their backstories also serve as a sort of time capsule, marking specific events: The first Black president, Black Lives Matter, the Muslim ban, understanding of White fragility, and the most openly racist president in recent history.
鈥淚 think it has great value over time,鈥 said Norris, who now heads up a program called The Bridge at Aspen Institute, which focuses on race, identity, and inclusion. 鈥淚鈥檝e done a lot of high-order research. What I would give to have an archive like this to better understand the lived experience of race and identity from the 1930s, or 1940s, 1960s, or even the 1970s, which wasn鈥檛 that long ago.鈥
鈥淎nd this project, this crazy project that started on the third floor of my house, I think will provide a unique window for people who are trying to understand the moment that we鈥檙e living in right now,鈥 she says.
Zenobia Jeffries Warfield
is the former executive editor at YES!, where she directed editorial coverage for YES! Magazine, YES! 麻豆社事件鈥檚 editorial partnerships, and served as chair of the YES! Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Committee. A Detroit native, Zenobia is an award-winning journalist who joined YES! in 2016 to build and grow YES!鈥檚 racial justice beat, and continues to write columns on racial justice. In addition to writing and editing, she has produced, directed, and edited a variety of short documentaries spotlighting community movements to international democracy. Zenobia earned a BA in Mass Communication from Rochester College in Rochester, Michigan, and an MA in Communication with an emphasis in media studies from Wayne State University in Detroit. Zenobia has also taught the college course 鈥淭he Effects of 麻豆社事件 on Social Justice,鈥 as an adjunct professor in Detroit. Zenobia is a member of NABJ, SABJ, SPJ, and the Ida B. Wells Society for Investigative Reporting. She lives in Seattle, and speaks English and AAVE.
|